|
BioenergeticMedicine.org & BioenergetischeMedizin.de
|
 |
||||
| Home | Contact | ||||
| |||||||||||
|
The following is a posts on the EnergeticMedicine Group at yahoogroups.com by Kiran Schmidt on the influence of Timing in bioenergetic testing Methods and Radionics.
Hello G., A. and
Group
what we are discussing
leads us as the book already says to "The margins of reality"
....its hard to follow, and unavoidable that things get abstract
(philosophical) here. No major change in any technical system has gone without
first shifting the philosophical outlook. You have overlooked that I have
actually invented the term "noise random" to discriminate it from
"pseudo random" because in fact I wanted to avoid that people think
that the opposite of "pseudo random" is "real random"
and as we apparently all agree "real" carries no meaning in this
context.
We have to use greater
abstraction in this field because we are dealing with the "informational
plane", its the level on which the relational blueprint of existence is
at work. If you use intuitive pictures like your analogy of the water or the
party you are unavoidably misleading your thinking..... on the informational
level concepts like quantity do not have any meaning ..... on the physical
level a drop of water has quite a significantly different effect than a gallon
of water..... but on the informational plane only qualities are related to
each other.
It surprises me that you
use such kind of examples .....as particularly in energetic Medicine we are
surrounded by all kinds of phenomena where quantity exactly does not count....
Homeopathy is the most striking example and its the age old enemy of those
people who cannot abstract "quantity" from their thinking.
Homeopathy and Radionics are very pure manifestation of the
informational level, .......in most other modalities, the physical level is
much more intertwined with the informational.
If you wanted to use any
analogies at all it would be more appropriate to use a book for an
example..... here in fact it does not matter if you have three equal books or
only one, .... with informational treatment modalities we want to make changes
on that informational level which is associated to a body and here in fact we
have to learn to think differently. Equally "real" or "not
real", as you wanted to hint with the party example have here no
meaning, just as it makes no sense to call one blueprint real and another
unreal....
It is a hard nut to crack
intellectually, to stop equating real=physical which you indicate when you
call the system you favor: real/physical
random event generation
but if you have any
spiritual practice, which I believe you do, then you will know that the
"physical" has actually the smallest degree of influence
as it is highly (in-)formed and guided by the informational plane (as the
Bible states "In the beginning was the Word = information, and the word
was by God and God was the word).... this means information is the ultimate
source.
As I wrote in the very
first post on this issue, one of my first exposures in computerized radionics
was through the system of the Munich company www.m-tec.ag which
is located not 10 miles from my parents home, they use an identical replica of
the Princeton set-up. So it is not as you say that now "I may be
disappointed" to find there is something more real around, in fact I
had studied this system and found it not more convincing as any other and if I
had found any significant difference I would certainly have invested the
approx. 50$ it cost to integrate a noise source.
Also those who do not
know the technicalities of radionic systems might have gotten the
idea that there is a signal of some kind running in the circuits which is
then somehow changed by the mind of the patient and consequently the deviation
registered by the electronics..... nothing of that sort is the case. I am
saying this because A. wanted to demonstrate how any such influence is
very unlikely to occur, which is quite correct, but none of the systems is
based or pretends to be based on such an effect. All start some kind of random
process at a given time and the sequence which comes up is in some form or
another linked to the moment when it was called upon.
As I said the eye-opener
for me was when I read the book "A new kind of Science". There is no
way for me to convey the connected complex of ideas which Wolfram barely
managed to fit into 1200 pages, you have to read it to get your mind to move a
few inches from its accustomed place. One of the many important points that he
is rigorously demonstrating for almost all fields of science is that the
equation random=unreal=meaningless=unpredictable=difficult-to-create is not at
all useful. If there is any ordering parameter for Randomness it is its degree
of complexity. And he is showing that extreme complexities can be generated
through an evolutionary mathematical process that can even with simple rules
simulate most complex technical phenomena (including electrical noise).
I choose this avenue of
pure mathematics, not because it is more simple but it is virtually only
limited by computational power and can create complexity superior to any
individual phenomena we know from nature. However even if you cannot follow
this argument because you do not have the mathematical background, one can
easily find examples to at least sense that unpredictability is an
illusion of our limited senses. Take the weather,..... it depends on millions
of factors..... however by using appropriate models and computational power,
we get weather forecasts that show that weather despite its incredible
complexity is quite predictable.... how much more so is a little noise
source that depends on dramatically fewer variables.
so much for now
be well
Kiran
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|