| |||||||||||
|
Frequently Asked Questions FAQ(just click on the question to jump to the answer) Comparison with other SystemsQ: I need to improve the reliability of testing method for dental foci (and maxillaries and so on, but especially dental!). I've used Vega Expert but I haven't much confidence. Some friends of mine who use EAV told me about their problems with it. There are a lot of devices on the market (BEST,AVATAR, ACUPRO, in Germany dr Lechner propose ScaSys based on Scalar wave, etc), but all seem a new version of old model. Q: In Germany dr Lechner propose ScaSys based on Scalar wave, what do you think about it? Q: I read
about two methods which seem interesting: Thermography (CRT 2000) and
Acuvision. The first based on Q: I 'd want to better understand if bioresonance working with QX (AutoTrivector, signal sending from tray, etc) is only "informational", therefore not giving "more physical signals" (energetic) sometimes essential for a successful therapy.
Q: Could I improve my therapeutic results with a good bioresonance device?
On the market there are systems too Q:
What I understand then, is, that you could run a diagnosis on myself here in
Auckland, and pinpoint whatever health issues I am currently undergoing. Q: Does the CoRe do therapies the same way the QXCI does? Q: Is the treatment with CoRe system comparatively faster and more successful? For example, you have a patient with multiple food allergies, parasites, dental foci plus candida and perhaps burdens from old flu infection and drugs used in excess. Q:
Any system should give diagnostic results which are real and it would be
even better if it ranked them by their importance. And even better had protocols
available to treat anything that shows up and monitored the progress while you
do this. No mistake, Bicom can do this and Questions about available CoRe functions and partsQ: What do the numbers in front of the Remedy names in the analysis chart? Practical Question on operating the CoRe systemQ: Should I consider buying the CoRe-System if I have now background education in natural health? Q: What are the basic steps in operating the CoRe What to do once the analysis is doneQ: What are best length and frequency of "synchronizing" times? How to interpret the CoRe analysis resultsQ: What does the Value-number mean in the analysis sheet after the Remedy Name? What can the CoRe do for me and my patientsQ: Does the CoRe work for wrinkles, hair loss, weight loss, vitamin deficiency? How can I enhance the use of the CoRe-SystemQ: Should I be emotionally involved in the process? More philosophical Questions about Radionics in generalQ: Does the CoRe use specific frequencies for treatment Q: How does radionic treatment work ? Q: Does radionic treatment diminish with distance? Q : Can you suggest any further reading on radionics? Q : The MoRa is a bio-resonance device and is for me only to understand by means of radionics. But why (for heavens sake) is the device full of electronics? Is the working principle is eventually on the plane of information? Legal QuestionsQ: Why do you have me sign a licensing agreement? Questions about complementary technologiesQ: here is a great offer in Rife devices. But which is really reliable? Do you have any experience in that? The disadvantage with the Rife is that you are not exactly sure which frequencies are most suitable. Comparison with other SystemsQ: I need to improve the reliability of testing method for dental foci (and maxillaries and so on, but especially dental!). I've used Vega Expert but I haven't much confidence. Some friends of mine who use EAV told me about their problems with it. There are a lot of devices on the market (BEST,AVATAR, ACUPRO, etc), but all seem a new version of old model. A: BEST, AVATAR, ACUPRO are all based on the application of an electric Point Probe and thus the readings are depending on various Factors, Humidity of the skin, applied Pressure, Probe-size and shape, angle of application, how often a particular point already has been used for measurement and so on. To keep all these parameters somewhat constant depends on much experience and can only somewhat be compensated by device specific means like spring-mounting of the probe, humidity compensation, pressure gage and so on. However the single most important parameter is the speed of application of the probe, that is something the manufacturers do not tell you because there is no way to compensate it by any means of the device. For this reason I consider EAV to be subjective to a large extend and for that reason Blind-testing studies with EAV have never shown convincing results. Having said all this I still consider EAV a valuable tool and a good adjunct diagnostic measure along with others, however a relatively inexpensive system will just give as good results as others as it is in fact a modern version of the old pendulum. Q: In Germany dr Lechner propose ScaSys based on Scalar wave, what do you think about it? A: The ScaSys uses an electric loop supposedly to transmit remedy information via Scalar Waves to the patient and the testing is then done with traditional Kinesiology. What the company is not telling you how they produce scalar waves, which certainly all high tech physics would wish to discover as they are said to be space-invariant, which means they do not need any time to transverse space and they are not deflected by matter. This would certainly be the ideal carrier wave for any kind of mass media communications and if Dr. Lechner or others who say they have found a way to produce it and modulate it with some complex remedy information would give out their secrets they could get billions and would not have to earn their money so hard on the alternative health market. Q: I read about
two methods which seem interesting: Thermography (CRT 2000) and Acuvision.
The first based on A: There have been many attempts to measure meridian points other than in an electric fashion, as everyone who is trying to work with electric probes objectively, soon realizes that they are not physical measuring instruments in the regular sense. To use the heat emanation (Thermography) is one way to use Kirlian luminescence is another, both have likewise not proven to be reproducible, but maybe new technologies will prove to be. Also for both technologies no solid pool of experimental data has been collected to interpret the data without ambiguity. My advice is to try out a given device and see if it is giving somewhat reproducible and intelligent results. Q: I 'd want to better understand if bioresonance working with QX (AutoTrivector, signal sending from tray, etc) is only "informational", therefore not giving "more physical signals" (energetic) sometimes essential for a successful therapy. A: First of all the QXCI is not a Bioresonance device as is claimed by the manufacturer, it has no circuitry to receive any data from the patient, it is not making a "handshake" with the patient as is said, it is not testing millions of parameters via an actual electric link with the patient. Opening the box will show to anyone with only the slightest understanding in electrical circuitry that there are no functional electric circuits but only an assortment of randomly selected parts. Yes, the lights are working and only show the status of the parallel interface of the computer, nothing more. The Harness is connected directly with the output of a regular soundcard speaker output and therefore one can measure some random electrical signal on it if one takes an oscilloscope, however if one for example runs the "Rife-Function" of the program no corresponding frequencies will be measured at the harness. Therefore the QXCI is the age old Radionics with a clever marketing strategy, and a colorful graphic surface.
Q: Could I improve my therapeutic results with a good bioresonance device?
On the market there are systems too A: Bioresonance different from pure Radionics (or the QXCI) has a working circuitry that inverts incoming signals from the patient and outputs it back to him. The idea came about when Morell and Rasche, two people from Germany came in contact with Scientology and Ron Hubbard's E-Meter and thought about ways to improve it, this is how MOrell-RAsche-Therapy (MORA-Therapy) was born, others like BICOM, AMS, Kindling a.s.o. came later as copy-cats. Bioresonace has certainly helped a lot of people, however if the effect is due to an Radionics effect or if complex patient information can in fact be inverted by a 10$ circuitry which basically simply makes a phase shift cannot be answered, however I have heard from practitioners that they got just as good results when they forgot to turn on the power or to plug in one of the electrodes. Q:
What I understand then, is, that you could run a diagnosis on myself here in
Auckland, and pinpoint whatever health issues I am currently undergoing. Back to top of page Q:
I agree if your equipment can do as much as the QXCI, why the $13,000?
On the other hand, patients here like to feel that the treatment is something
real, even if they can't feel anything. I lot of straps makes
you feel "treated".
Q: Does the
CoRe do therapies the same way the QXCI does?
A: Yes, in Radionics a symbolic representation is created of the object you
want to treat,
be it an organ, an emotion, disease or whole person. This symbolic object is
then
mathematically synchronized with a representation of a remedy...... this works
a change on the informational level and is helpful if the problem originates
on the informational level. Now the user is not seeing any of this process which is happening in the
background
but instead the QXCI is giving you a graphical animation of the process which
is
just a visual representation but has nothing to do with the actual
functioning.
The CoRe is leaving out this (to me) deceptive part and instead is more easy
to operate
and more reproducible.
A: The CoRe is certainly way more reproducible in the Pattern Recognition
mode than the QXCI however I would not
totally discard the QXCI mode or that of regular radionics, which I call Number evaluation, I even use it in cases which are more acute and changeable in nature...... I usually compare the CoRe mode to a more constitutional, means long term analysis, compared to the more changeable and more momentary view of regular radionic analysis. As you see you have the choice to see both by selecting them from the database form. The difference of effectiveness in broadcasting (synchronizing) between CoRe and other radionic instruments has not been established objectively, however subjectively after using the QXCI myself for a few years and now working with the CoRe an equal amount of time I see that it about equally often gives good results.
Please also remember that Radionics is a diagnostic aid in the first
place, radionic treatment will only give results if the primary cause for
the problem is on the information level, but than it is very effective and
can usually give immediate results, which in that form cannot be achieved by
any other modality.
Q: Is the treatment with CoRe system comparatively faster and more successful? For example, you have a patient with multiple food allergies, parasites, dental foci plus candida and perhaps burdens from old flu infection and drugs used in excess.
A: I still use EDS/EAV parallel with the CoRe to
compare and confirm results and I know they are
very complementary. For years for example I
used a VEGA Quicktest to scan hundreds of
remedies via EAV. I do not do that anymore, at
best I confirm the top analysis results of the
CoRe with EAV and this is a very successful
combination. Imagine how could you even come
close to test 20 thousand remedies with EAV and
this is how many there are available with the CoRe.
Also instead of pocking a patients fingers
hundreds of times with the point probe now you
have time to discuss the results which come up
on the screen.
Q: Any system should give diagnostic results which are real and it would
be even better if it ranked them by their importance. And even better had
protocols available to treat anything that shows up and monitored the progress
while you do this. No mistake, Bicom can do this and
A: You
say a system "should give diagnostic
results which are real"
Now for some people the
question what is real and what is not is a very simple one, for me however
in respect to patients and
illness it is not so clear cut
To me concepts like you
mentioned dental foci, parasites, food intolerances, multiple allergies.....
are more possible gateways to
understand the real situation of the patient, any one or any combination
of the above can do that.
Yes, the CoRe-System, like
all the others will alert you to these kind of things and 20000 more.
Viewed together and in
conjunction with the Filter-function of the CoRe-System....
used by a skilled
practitioner this will give an enormous insight into the patients situation.
But taken on
face value alone and isolated
from the rest this can lead you just as quickly into dead ends.
On seminars for example I
just ask volunteers to be connected to the CoRe and in front of the
audience I will tell them
what I see from the CoRe is their situation, just to get the amazement
effect.
However in real practice I do
a good anamnesis first and then use the CoRe to clarify and connect
the dots. This all together
takes for me usually about an hour.
Different than Bicom and EAV also Radionic
systems like the CoRe can do a Broadcast which is
often surprisingly effective if the cause of the
illness is on the informational level,,,, there is an
Indicator page for the different functions in
the new CoRe 2.0 which helps you to track results,
but I usually trust more on the subjective
experience of the patient.
Computerized radionic system are usually quite a
challenge for some people who are used to
do just EAV/EDS testing or testing with
something else like Kinesology or Pendulum, because
it confronts you with such a number of possible
healing remedies and modalities that you either
face the challenge by constantly trying to learn
more or just to give up.
When you do any form of One-by-One testing like
in EDS you have only a very limited number of
things you can test, all things you have put
together more or less by your personal preferences....
so testing results are never as surprising as
when you use a system like the CoRe...... or would you
for example have tested all the remedies which
came up with the CoRe (please see the file I have uploaded
a few minutes ago) as an example for
depression?.... and the few you see is usually only a fraction
of several hundred in every group.
The CoRe-System is a Hybrid of a Radionic system
and a traditional knowledge base for natural medicine.
You can do radionic scans of the whole Database
as usual in other systems like the QXCI or Quantec or
you can limit your scan and analysis to a given
symptom or disease which will only rank remedies that have
indicated that they are useful in this respect.
Questions about available CoRe functions and partsQ:
Your literature states that the wrist strap electrode is only symbolic.
Does this mean that it is actually not doing anything at all, but be a placebo
pacifier? Q: We are getting closer to making a decision on purchasing a CoRE-System, so what is the minimum specification for a laptop computer to get the most out of the system, and for later upgrading? A: Any PC (not Mac) will do fine, and you will need MS Office or Excel 98 or younger installed Q:
I'm also no entirely sure what the A-Z Remedies database has that isn't
included in the Q:
What do the numbers in front of the Remedy names in the analysis chart? Q:
I have studied the I Ching for over 30 years but I am not quite sure exactly
what you have in mind with this function. Can you elaborate on this? Practical Question on operating the CoRe systemQ:
Should I consider buying the CoRe-System if I have now background education in
natural health?
A: The CoRe System is very easy to operate, however it has a database of
several thousand remedies which come up during analysis, so if you do not have
any background in any form of natural health modality you will not be able Q: What are the basic steps in operating the CoRe
A:
with the CoRe it is as easy as 1-2-3
1. Type in the symptoms
2.Select the group of remedies you want to scan and press analyze
3.Select the most probable remedies from the list of top remedies the CoRe has
suggested,
enter them in the CoRe-Remedy Tray and synchronize (treat) with these items.
What to do once the analysis is doneQ:
Once the analysis is made, would treatment be made purely radionically, or
adjunct with standard homeopathics, Bach flowers etc.? Q: What are best length and frequency of "synchronizing" times ? A: I do not want to pretend that I have all the answers and will be very happy to integrate your experience and would also encourage you to post your experiences on the "energetic Medicine Newsgroup" as already quite a few people use the CoRe and might be able to help you as well. For now it seems that you best work like in Homeopathy, for long standing chronic illness or deep seated pathologies you do longer (up to 8 hours) and less frequent Synchronizing, for more acute or quickly progressing symptoms use short (1-10 minutes) and more frequent Synchronizing ( for example 3 times a day). How to interpret the CoRe analysis resultsQ: Do you provide a manual that gives guidelines for interpreting the results, or even selecting choices? A: No, this has to be the result of your training, the CoRe can only suggest the most likely choices. Also please remember that the CoRe is only an aid for diagnosis, not a replacement for sound education in the health profession, the CoRe is a very sophisticated tool and if you use it as such, it will have great value for your practice, but if you sacrifice your own good judgment or take analysis results too literal without a holistic viewpoint you will not have optimal results. The ability for lateral thinking is a key ability in understanding the condition of a patient just as well as in using the CoRe. Q:
What does the Value-number mean in the analysis sheet after the Remedy Name? A: All results presented by the CoRe are Radionic Resonance Values not
measuring results in the ordinary sense. This is usually the most difficult
thing to get adjusted to for a Beginner in Radionics. If an Item comes up with a
high Resonance Value it means that it has some sort of Connection with the
symptom and the Patient. The Connection can sometimes be that it is the Cause of
the Symptom or a Remedy for the symptom, but more often it does not stand in
such a linear connection. Radionics is a holistic way of looking at the
situation, so it happens often that it takes some probing and thinking to find
the relation. As an analogy take the following example: If you would ask a room
full of people who feels that he resonates with "Circus" then maybe a
great number of them would raise their hands. Now the reasons for this resonance
might be very different from one another, one might resonate because he likes
animals, another because he has such fond memories being in the circus as a
child, another because he finds it repugnant to force animals to do silly tricks
a.s.o. To take the fact that Brain comes up with a value of 100 could mean that
there is a psychological component to the problem, but also one should consider
the fact that there is maybe an involvement of the nervous system as it is ruled
from the brain, or it could mean that the patient has to find a way to think
differently about the situation, or it could simply mean the patient is a very
brain centred individual a.s.o. The items coming up are coincidental (please
read more about the role and meaning of coincidences elsewhere on this site e.g.
here) which are
statistically filtered from millions of possible connections and are thus most
often meaningful but it may happen that there are cases where this meaning
cannot be found or does not exist. What can the CoRe do for me and my patientsQ:
Does the CoRe work for wrinkles, hair loss, weight loss, vitamin deficiency?
A: Inversion is the process copied from Bioresonance in which information it
transmitted to the body in an
inversed form, this has often proven to stimulate the body to neutralize
certain resident information.
This can be useful in all cases where for example toxins have been removed for
example by chelation or
Detox programs but the information is still there, just like a memory of some
illness.
It is a common misunderstanding of contemporary medicine that it is enough to
remove the "substantial"
component of an illness, like a bullet sticking in the flesh. If it is removed
and the wound heals, never the
less there is a memory in the body which can bother a person over years, here
you can run the items which
the CoRe-System found in the "Inversion"-Mode and they will often
help very much in this process of
erasing the memory.
Also in all cases of "Trauma", particularly emotional and mental the
inversion mode can help, but I still would
generally use the "Combination"-Mode first which aims at
"Balancing".
Inversion is more akin to the Allopathic approach in which you give a
substance which has an opposite or
neutralizing effect than the illness you are treating, for example for High
Blood Pressure you give a Blood Pressure
reducing substance or for Stomach acidity you give an alkalizing substance and
so on. The idea for the Inversion-Mode
in the CoRe-System is the same only with the difference that it is here
working on the Information-Level.
As a rule of thumb, try the Combination-Mode first, if the items showing do
not harmonize with your experience
and/or you feel the patient need a form of elimination more than balancing
then use the Inversion-Mode.
How can I enhance the use of the CoRe-SystemQ: Should I be
emotionally involved in the process?
A: As you might have seen from my site I divide observable phenomena in causal
and a-causal or coincidental phenomena. Knowledge, Interpretation, ability of
Observation, Sensitivity, Intent, emotional strength I would all still consider
as part of the causal realm however subtle or neglected by contemporary science
and useful in healing as Q:
What do you think about retest an item, which comes up form CoRe test, with an
other method for confirmation? Or about opportunity to do some other kind of
test (if one knows any) for items that he suspect and the CoRe didn't show? More philosophical Questions about Radionics in generalQ: Does the
CoRe use specific frequencies for treatment Q: How does radionic treatment work ? A: Radionics works on the Informational Level. It is in fact the oldest healing modality. In the shamanistic tradition the healer would use symbols, thought and ritual movement pattern to heal. Common day experience is also that often if we think about someone, look at his picture or use one of his belongings, coincidently the person calls or shows up at the door. Because these effects work on the informational Level, they do not need electricity, magnetism or any other form of radiation for transmission like in energetic medicine. It is an old knowledge of all spiritual traditions that on some level everything is connected with everything else instantaneously. On this level our human concepts of time and space are not useful for understanding, things on the informational Level are ordered via concepts like analogy and meaning. In the computer age this connection of patient information with healing information is performed via software programs and has proven effective in many cases were the original problem is on the Informational Level. Concepts like Frequency, Intensity, Distance, Vibration, Carrier wave, energy form have no meaning on the Informational Level, as those parameters were created to describe phenomena on the energetic Level. Q: Does radionic treatment diminish with distance? A: No, energetic modalities like magnetism or Rife-plasma radiation or X-ray radiation or heat treatment do diminish with the inverse square of the distance to the source, this is a distinguishing factor from any modality working on the informational Level, were treatment effect is independent of distance. Q : Can you suggest any further reading on radionics? Radionics
Interface With the Ether Fields Report
on Radionics Radionics
and the Subtle Anatomy of Man
Q : The MoRa is a bio-resonance device and is for me only to understand by means of radionics. But why (for heavens sake) is the device full of electronics? Is the working principle is eventually on the plane of information? A : One definition of Radionics is that "It is the science of Symbols". So Radionics works more or less scientifically with Symbols to influence physical things or people or illnesses. MoRa was first designed in the seventies when everyone was full of excitement about the limitless possibilities of electronics, but in fact Morell and Rasche rediscovered Radionics in a new medium, that of electronic circuitry. By symbolically redesigning a healing process by means of electronic flow plans they could successfully treat those illnesses that were accessible with this particular symbol. The Symbol Mora uses is that of "Inversion", represented electronically by a Phase-shifting electronic component which basically inverts the incoming signal. This approach will work for all that diseases that are primarily on the Informational plane and that need and Inversion process like for example old memories of trauma or toxins in the body which already physically have been removed but have still left an informational imprint. However this way is also very limited because electronics has only a limited number of symbolic solutions to the great variety of disease conditions. Software is a much more flexible medium, so for example the CoRe-System allows you not only to choose "Inversion" but also for example processes like "Strengthening", "Balancing" and "Support" which are archetypal very different than "inversion" which is actually the common allopathic approach.
Legal QuestionsQ:
Some of the other equipment manufacturers have a database of case Q: Why do you have me sign a licensing agreement? A: The Licensing agreement is only about not copying the CD or renting
it out. A: I guess it is obvious that only if you are a licensed Health Care Provider
you can advertise your services. Questions about complementary technologiesQ: here is a great offer in Rife devices. But which is really reliable? Do you have any experience in that? The disadvantage with the Rife is that you are not exactly sure which frequencies are most suitable. A: You are right, the first problem with Rife-therapy is to find the appropriate Frequencies, F-San attempts to find them by doing a sweep and then measuring changes of impedance, which works sometimes but not always. There can be many reasons for why Rife-Therapy is not successful in some cases, obviously the first to me it that Rife is not the appropriate modality in the given case because the problem is not primarily on the energetic plane but one of the other three which I describe on this site also. Another reason to me is that the very notion that a disease could be narrowed down to a single frequency is mistaken ..... never the less Rife Therapy is often successful, its just that we do not yet know enough of all the connections. As a simple Rife-Pad device the F-Scan is probably at the moment the most well engineered. Also the next update of the CoRe-System will have a function to help radionically determine rife-frequencies. Q: I can
accept your views about reproducibility regarding bio-tensor
A: Well I know that they are as reproducible as
you allow them/want them to be.
For example Staufen Pharma in Germany the biggest
supplier or EAV test preparations
gives out a list every year of what are the top
100 things EAV testers find in a ranked order.
It changes every year only in so far as some new
fashionable remedy or toxin-idea
hit the market.... the rest stays the same.
If you are a person who prefers to be more
reproducible you will find mostly the same
2 or 3 dozen things in your patients, to which
you are accustomed or which your personal
preferences dictate..... not that this is false
but you have to be aware of that fact.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|